Bold Business Logo

SoftBank: The True Global Rideshare King

SoftBank Group Corp., a Japanese multinational holdings company founded by Masayoshi Son and based in Tokyo, is the true global rideshare leader. While their name does not necessarily ring a bell to the average American, this company’s investment arm recently took a bold step in creating a deal with ride-hailing giant Uber. This agreement has sealed SoftBank as the real king of ride-hailing, having previously invested in other similar companies in the past.

A Shakeup within Uber

SoftBank initiated a deal in November 2017, offering some of Uber’s earliest investors and shareholders, including both its employees and some venture capital (VC) firms like First Round and Benchmark, to cash out.

Since 2014, SoftBank has created million and billion dollar deals with other rideshare companies like India’s Ola, Singapore’s Grab, China’s Didi Chuxing, and even Brazil’s 99 (later acquired by Didi Chuxing as well). The most recent one, involving Uber, was sealed on January 18. Its bold impacts include expanding Uber’s board to 17 members from its original 11.

This means a reduced voting power from Uber’s early shareholders, thus limiting the influence of Uber co-founder and former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Travis Kalanick. He sold almost a third of his 10% stake, valued at around $1.4 billion. The change also included adding two SoftBank directors to Uber’s board, namely Rajeev Misra, the head of SoftBank’s $100 billion Vision Fund, and Marcelo Claure, the president and CEO of Sprint Corp.

SoftBank has invested over $35 billion into the ride-sharing sector, with an initial investment of $1.25 billion in Uber, making it the ridesharing giant’s biggest shareholder with a 17.5% stake in the company experts believe that in the foreseeable future, ridesharing utilities will more or less overtake taxis, and the market is expected to go up to $285 billion by the year 2030. Apps like Whipster are taking advantage of this taxi and rideshare disruption by helping riders easily decide which ride share, bike share, taxi, or public transportation is the most feasible for them –considering both price and time.

Some of SoftBank’s other notable investments aside from the recent Uber deal include: $210 million on Ola in October 2014, $250 million on Grab in December 2014, another $750 million on Grab in September 2016, another $330 million on Ola in February 2017, $200 million on Didi Chuxing/99 in May 2017, and $2.5 billion on Grab in July 2017.

The Future of Automobile

The SoftBank deal with Uber has led to optimism, but others still felt concerned, which the new board quickly addressed. “We have tremendous confidence in Uber’s leadership and employees and are excited to support Uber as it continues to reinvent how people and goods are transported around the world,” said Misra in a statement.

Softbank’s investment in riding sharing.

Tony Seba, a Stanford instructor, and James Arbib, a tech investor, co-authored a study that revealed only around 20% of Americans will own a car over the next 15 years. Passenger vehicles will fall from 247 million in 2020 to just 44 million in 2030.

This projected 80% drop in private car ownership complements the increase in electric ride sharing. Their study shows that ridesharing will be around four to 10 times cheaper per mile compared to buying a new car, potentially saving families as much as $5,600 a year.

The report suggests that if the vast majority of Americans to either switch to ride shares or simply go autonomous, it can create bold impacts not just in the way people travel. It may affect how American cities plan their roads as well, potentially lowering the need for parking spaces thus increasing other possible uses for land, including parks and other carless zones.

“We are on the cusp of one of the fastest, deepest, most consequential disruptions of transportation in history,” Seba said in a press release. He affirmed there is nothing “magical” about the disruption, but rather credits economics as the driving factor of such bold changes.

Amazon HQ2 Shortlist: The Search Intensifies with final list of Top 20 Cities

Amazon is an internet giant. It was founded by Jeff Bezos in 1994 and went online in 1995. The company started out in Bezos’ garage selling books online. In two months, its revenues were at $20,000 a month. It went public in 1997 at $18.00 per share. By 2006, it had a market capitalization of $17.5 billion. At the start of 2017, it had grown to a capitalization of $355.9 billion, which was more than the combined capitalization of the next eight largest retailers (online or otherwise). Thus, it is no wonder why the Amazon HQ2 shortlist has become a considerably big deal.

The company is considered the world’s largest company in terms of revenue. It ranks fourth in terms of value as a publicly-traded company and is the eighth largest employer in the country.  It employed 541,900 people by the third quarter of 2017—of which 159,500 were hired from June to September. It employed an additional 120,000 workers to fulfill the fourth quarter seasonal sales volume.

Amazon’s First Headquarters

Amazon has its headquarters in Seattle, Washington, with more than 40,000 employees working in 33 buildings within the city. There are 24 restaurants, as well as eight other service establishments within the Amazon headquarters. For the headquarters alone, it has capital investments of more than $3.7 billion and $1.4 billion in operational expenses.

The indirect effects of Amazon to Seattle are significant. From 2010 to 2017, the number of Fortune 500 companies with engineering and research or development offices located in Seattle who deal directly with Amazon increased from 7 to 31. There have been an estimated 53,000 additional new jobs in the city due to Amazon’s direct investments. Also, there have been additional investments worth $38 billion within Seattle from Amazon’s direct investments.

In the opinion of Amazon, it is time for them to house additional employees in a different city. In September of 2017, Amazon issued a request for proposal (RFP) to cities capable and willing to host Amazon’s second headquarters. Considering the growth of Seattle during the last seven years, the second headquarters will undeniably have a massive effect on whichever city will be chosen from the Amazon HQ2 shortlist.

On the Selection Process for Amazon HQ2 Shortlist: Criteria for Judging

Amazon created a bidding war when it released its RFP. It detailed the requirements for Amazon’s second headquarters.

In doing so, it also gave an insight into the impact it had on Seattle, Washington, as well as its expected impact on the HQ2 host city.

Amazon cites several core preferences in its RFP, including a location within 30 miles of a population center. It has to be within 45 minutes of an international airport. It has to be no more than 1 to 2 miles away from major arterial roads, as well as having on-site access to a subway, metro, and bus routes. The proposed HQ2 will have an initial (Phase I) space requirement of at least 500,000 square feet. This detail is an immediate requirement as construction is set to start in 2019. By 2027, it is expected to have up to 8 million square feet of office space.

The estimated capital investment will start at $300,000,000 and reach $600,000,000. Phase II building will double the office space to 2 million square feet, and cost up to $1.26 billion. Phase II building will increase the office space to 3 million square feet, and the estimated capital investment is expected to reach close to $2 billion. Phase IV is expected to expand the existing office space in an organic manner. At the end of the 15-17 year project, HQ2 will have 8 million square feet and will have cost $5 billion to build.

On Labor Force, Culture and Tax Incentives

For the labor force, the HQ2 will have about 50,000 employees after the project has been completed. To fill up these job requirements, the buildings or campus must be located near a city with at least a million residents. It also must have a ready pool of highly educated individuals and skilled laborers with the corresponding educational attainment. This case can be assured with a university system or systems within the city’s immediate environs. Housing the new employees will be a growing concern as the project for the HQ2 development progresses.

The cultural community fit was also emphasized, for the city to be in-sync with the employees’ and company’s culture. These factors include educational opportunities, recreational facilities and overall high quality of life. Culturally diverse communities are at an advantage. Furthermore, one of the reasons for Amazon’s bidding process was to have the ability to avail of tax incentives and lower cost of development, as well as the ongoing cost of doing business. This fact has lead to the search to cities which have existing programs for subsidies, grants, tax breaks, and other incentives.

Top 20 Candidates of Amazon HQ2 Shortlist

Amazon released its Amazon HQ2 shortlist of 20 cities, which are the finalists in the company’s search for a second headquarters. The Amazon HQ2 shortlist included: Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Boston, MA; New York City, NY; Newark, NJ; Pittsburgh, PA; Philadelphia, PA; Montgomery County in Maryland; Washington D.C.; Raleigh, NC; Northern Virginia, VA; Atlanta, GA; Miami, FL; Columbus, OH; Indianapolis, IN; Chicago, IL; Denver, CO; Nashville, TN; Los Angeles, CA; Dallas, TX; and Austin, TX. The proposals included some business perks and other come-ons for Amazon to consider. These include tax breaks, subsidies and other incentives.

These are the finalist cities from the Amazon HQ2 shortlist with their listed incentives, subsidies and other advantages:

  1. Atlanta, Georgia. The city’s proposal was in cooperation with the Governor’s office and would be upwards of $1 billion. It has a population of 5.6 million residents, with an unemployment rate of 4.2 percent and a relatively low median household income of $59,183. Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology are within its metropolitan area. Close to two-thirds of the population support offer incentives to Amazon as long as it brings in the jobs it promised.
  2. Austin, Texas. One of the largest acquisitions in recent years was when Amazon bought Whole Foods Market, the Austin-based reseller. However, even though it’s part of the Amazon HQ2 shortlist, the city did not offer any large incentive plan. The proponents have also been very secretive about their proposal. With a population of 1.9 million and an unemployment rate of 2.6 percent, it would be necessary for Amazon to import new talent to meet its employment needs. The University of Texas, Austin is located within city limits. To host Amazon HQ2, the city has to invest in additional infrastructure including roads and airports.
  3. Boston, Massachusetts. Boston is well-known as a university—with Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Tufts University, and Boston College—in its district. The state itself was the site of an IT boom during the 1970s and 1980s. It has a history of innovation which continues to today. It has a population of 4.7 million, with a 3 percent unemployment rate. The median home sale price is $573,300 and the median rent is $1,660. Unlike other proposals, Boston made its proposal public. Also notably, unlike some other proposals, Boston had few tax breaks.
  4. Chicago, Illinois. It has a population of 9.5 million and an unemployment rate of 4.7 percent. Its top colleges include the University of Chicago and Northwestern University. It has a diverse population and rich cultural scene. Chicago presented a proposal which included 10 proposed sites. An important item on its bid is the possible location of HQ2 along the city’s South Side. (This area is the former location of the Michael Reese Hospital, which was demolished in 2009.) The redevelopment of the area is called the “Burnham Lakefront”. The mixed-use campus can have office space and high-rise towers, with housing over 144 acres of land, parks, public plazas and dedicated traffic lanes for self-driving vehicles. The campus can have office space of as much as 14 million square feet. In addition, the city is offering about $1.32 billion from personal income taxes collected from company workers annually. There is also a possible $400 million grant for infrastructure and capital spending around the proposed HQ2 area.
  5. Columbus, Ohio. Columbus has one of the smallest populations among the finalists included in the Amazon HQ2 shortlist, with only 1,995,004. It also has a 5.1 percent unemployment rate. The small population gives Columbus little chance of being chosen. It has a low median home sale price of $149,700 and a median rent of $740. Ohio State University is located here. It proposed a 15-year 100 percent abatement on property taxes on all Amazon HQ2 sites. This detail is equivalent to savings of $456,750 for every $1 million in property investments. Additionally, there would be a 35 percent refund on income tax withholdings for new full-time employees. This would total up to $50 million annually and up to $400 million in 15 years. Markedly, total savings for Amazon over 15 years could reach $2.3 billion!
  6. Dallas, Texas. The city has a population of close to seven million, with an unemployment rate of 3.2 percent. It also has a low median rent at only $880. Within its city limits is the Southern Methodist University. It is considered as one of the few cities which can accommodate an increase in population. The city is already in talks of developing a bullet-train, which would cost $15 billion and would take the 240-mile trip between Houston and Dallas in 90 minutes. The HQ2 campus would include a station for the high-speed rail. An alternative site in Dallas is that of the former Valley View Mall. This location can be converted to a 500,000 square foot office building, as part of a 430-acre campus.
  7. Denver, Colorado. Denver has an emerging tech and innovation industry, which made it an early favorite among those included in the Amazon HQ2 shortlist. It has a population of 2.7 million, with an unemployment rate of 2.8 percent. The median home sale price is $393,700 and the median rent is $1,040. Incentives could come in the form of the following: job growth tax credit; up to $1,200 job training grants per employee; income tax credits for Amazon to locate in distressed areas; tuition benefits for employees; and other local city incentives. Interestingly, the total incentives package would be worth more than $100 million.
  8. Indianapolis, Indiana. The chances of Indianapolis winning the bid are so slim that even Mayor Joe Hogsett said that it was a “long shot”. Nevertheless, the city has a population of 1.9 million, and an unemployment rate of 3.1 percent. The median home list price is a low $140,990 and the median rent is a low $690. In truth, the cost of living, home prices, and rent, as well as the cost of doing business, makes Indianapolis an attractive alternative.
  9. Los Angeles, California. It has a population of 13 million, with a 3.8 percent unemployment rate. Its median home sale price is a high $675,500 and a median rent of $1,360. The University of Southern California, University of California Los Angeles, and Occidental College are within Los Angeles. It is also worth noting that among all the cities on the West Coast, Los Angeles was the only one included in the Amazon HQ2 shortlist. The California governor’s office will provide $300 million in tax breaks, if any city is chosen within the state. Another state bill introduced in November could raise the tax breaks to $1 billion over the next decade.
  10. Miami, Florida. Miami has a population of 5.9 million residents and an unemployment rate of 4.1 percent. The median home value is $306,000 and the median rent is $1,070. Still, although Miami is the home of the University of Miami, there may not be enough employees to support such a massive project.
  11. Montgomery County, Maryland. The Maryland Governor’s office offered $5 billion in tax incentives if HQ2 is built in the state. It has a population of 6 million, with an unemployment rate of 3.6 percent. It has a high median household income of $93,804. It also has a high median rent of $2,070. (There are two other cities close to Washington, DC in the shortlist.)
  12. Nashville, Tennessee. With a population of 1.8 million, Nashville is on the low side compared to the others on the Amazon HQ2 shortlist. It also has a 2.6 percent unemployment rate. The median home sale price is $239,600 and the median rent is $910. Vanderbilt University is within its boundaries. There are few details about the Nashville bid, although there is a hint that it may not be as “absurd” or creative as other bids. The city’s bid may have a very slim chance of winning due to the small population and the problem with mass transit.
  13. Newark, New Jersey. Newark shares a greater metropolitan area with New York. It also has a 4.8 percent unemployment rate. It is home to an Amazon company, Audible. It has the most to gain with the Amazon HQ2 due to having one-third of the population under the poverty line. In truth, Newark is offering the biggest amount in tax breaks worth $7 billion over several years. The proposal involves the expansion of the existing Grow NJ program which provides incentives for companies with “transformative projects”. The Grow NJ expansion would provide $10,000 in subsidies for every job Amazon creates. Furthermore, the city is close to New York, with several institutions of higher learning, but it does not share the high cost of land and property in New York.
  14. New York, New York. The New York metropolitan area has a population of 20 million, which it shares with Newark. It has an unemployment rate of 4.3 percent. The median home sale price is $836,100 and the median rent is a high $2,070. Within the city can be found Columbia University, New York University, Barnard College, Cooper Union, and Yeshiva University. The main selling point of the city is that it has a diverse talent and that it is the global capital for innovation, culture, and commerce. Unlike Newark, New York did not offer any tax breaks or financial incentives. The size and diversity of the city fit with the Amazon culture, but the cost of living might cause it to be dropped from the running. It also has more than 26 million square feet of available office space.
  15. Northern Virginia, Virginia. Northern Virginia shares its metropolitan area with Washington D.C., has a population of 6 million. It has a high median household income of $93,804 and an unemployment rate of 3.6 percent. The median home value for Northern Virginia, specifically Arlington, is $649,700, and the median rent is $1,720. Nearby educational institutions include Georgetown University and George Washington University. Virginia decided to bid for the Northern Virginia region, instead of just Arlington. They wanted to leverage the other features of the region, like skiing, as a benefit for the bid.
  16. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The City of Brotherly Love has 6 million residents and an unemployment rate of 4.4 percent. The median rent is $960. The University of Pennsylvania is located in Philadelphia. The city has three ongoing development projects that total around 28 million square feet: Schuykill Yards, uCity Square and Navy Yard. These are already connected to other offices, retailers, transit lines and residential areas. The city is also offering office space in the iconic 30th Street Station. The state is offering more than $1 billion in tax breaks. In addition, the city is considering a possible tax exemption of more than $2 billion over the next 10 years.
  17. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh has a population of 2.3 million and an unemployment rate of 4.3 percent. The median household income is relatively low at $54,020. The median home value is a low $130,400 and the median rent is also a low $720. Carnegie Mellon University is located in Pittsburgh. There are no details as yet of the bid. However, the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records ordered that it should be released to the public within 30 days after Amazon released their Amazon HQ2 shortlist. The main strength of Pittsburgh is its affordable housing. It has enough available affordable housing units which can help to attract and keep much-needed talent.
  18. Raleigh, North Carolina. Based on the Amazon criteria, Raleigh seems to be the leading candidate among the candidates listed in the Amazon HQ2 shortlist. In terms of incentives, it has the Job Development Investment Grant, which can result in reimbursements of up to 100 percent of withholding taxes for the new jobs created in the next 25 years. Up to $50 million can also be claimed for infrastructure including water, sewer and rail access. There is also the One North Carolina Fund which awards up to $5,000 per year per job up to five years. The city has a population of 1.2 million, just a little over the minimum set by Amazon. It has an unemployment rate of 3.9 percent. It is home to Duke University and the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Raleigh just met the minimum population requirement, but it would be hard-pressed to find an additional 50,000 residents who would be qualified to work for Amazon. The bulk of the new employees would have to come from elsewhere.
  19. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Toronto is the only remaining Canadian finalist included in the Amazon HQ2 shortlist. It has a population of 6.2 million with an unemployment rate of 7.8 percent. The median rent is $1,205. The University of Toronto can be located in the city. The city does not offer any tax break or incentives. However, it should be noted that the Toronto corporate tax rate is lower than in the United States. Alphabet’s Sidewalk Labs recently launched a redevelopment project to turn a portion of Toronto into a smart city. There is more than enough land in the Sidewalk Labs area to house Amazon’s office building needs.
  20. Washington D.C. The greater metropolitan area where Washington is located has a combined population of 6 million, with an unemployment rate of 3.6 percent. The median household income is a high $93,804. The median home sale price is $481,600 and the median rent is $1,310. Georgetown University and George Washington University are located nearby. The contents of the bid have been kept secret. The only thing not secret about the bid was the cost of making it, which was $140,000.

Looking Beyond the Amazon HQ2 Shortlist

Amazon’s intended development of its second headquarters—a fact that has brought about the Amazon HQ2 shortlist —is unprecedented and it has caused some concern for those cities aspiring to win the bidding. Most of the concerns stem from the number of actual residents who would be ultimately employed by Amazon, instead of having an influx of people coming into the city.

Another concern is housing—specifically, the availability of housing for the new employees as well as the expected increase in cost brought about by higher housing demand. City leaders and planners are aware that their incentives and offers may be more than any future benefits. However, the possibility of developing their city with the help of a tech company acting as an anchor is irresistible. The cities listed in the Amazon HQ2 shortlist hope that the progress that happened to Seattle in the last 7 years would also happen to their own after winning the bid for Amazon HQ2.

Tesla Partners with Big Brands to Develop Electric Semi “MegaChargers”

Elon Musk’s Tesla, Inc. has been creating plenty of buzz recently with its many outrageous projects, including Hyperloop and the very recent SpaceX launch of the Falcon Heavy. With its bold, game-changing ideas, what is next for Tesla?

Only recently, Tesla announced its plans for the Tesla Semi Trucks, well on their way to production by 2019. However, people have wondered why there was little to no information about the innovative trucks’ charging mechanism.

Bound to disrupt the trucking business, Tesla is reportedly collaborating with major brands Anheuser-Busch, PepsiCo, and UPS for their on-site charging terminals. The Tesla Semis are limited only to routes that are just enough to get to and from their destinations and points of origin before running out of their batteries – at least, for now.

A Charging Phenom

On their own, Tesla is also going ahead with their plans of creating charging stations, selling electricity to Tesla drivers passing by to recharge their trucks. They already operate over 1,100 “supercharger” stations for people who drive Tesla passenger cars, so having a similar network for their truck chargers is almost a no-brainer.

Musk has previously spoken about creating these “megachargers” and claiming they could charge a Semi battery in just 30 minutes. He claims the 30-minute megacharging session can add an impressive 400 miles of range to a Tesla Semi. Analysts say this means a charge rate of as much as 1.6 megawatts.

As for the specific time window, Musk said it is because it takes about 30 minutes to load and unload a truck – thus, truckers would not lose time as their trucks are charging at their stops. He also said they are offering a guaranteed rate of seven cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) at the megacharger stations, further optimizing savings versus how much the same amount of fuel conventional diesel trucks use.

A Tesla spokeswoman confirmed they are working closely with customers regarding these Semi charging stations.

Big Names, Big Businesses

Some of the biggest names in various industries have confirmed their partnerships with Tesla, but none have disclosed cost estimates regarding building their own chargers.

Anheuser-Busch ordered 40 Tesla Semis. According to James Sembrot, their Senior Director of Supply Chain, the company is evaluating the thought of installing their own charging equipment to certain key locations such as their large breweries. “What was important to us was to make a big investment in this cutting-edge technology and secure our place in line,” he said.

PepsiCo ordered their own fleet of 100 Tesla Semis. The company said they may even explore sharing costs and facilities with other companies open to the arrangement. PepsiCo executive Mike O’Connell revealed the multinational food and drink giant has discussed with Tesla over several meetings regarding the latter’s recharging capabilities. “We have a lot of in-house capability around energy and engineering,” said the senior director for Frito-Lay North America, PepsiCo’s snack foods unit. “Certainly Tesla brings their expertise to the table on energy and charging.”


UPS ordered the largest amount so far, with 125 Tesla Semis. They expect to work closely with the innovative auto company when it comes to building their on-site charging stations.

Loblaw Companies Ltd, a grocery chain based in Brampton, Canada, said they will most likely turn to solar power when it comes to charging their 25 pre-ordered Tesla Semis. According to Loblaw spokeswoman Catherine Thomas, the company was considering not just Tesla but also “a few other companies” when it comes to both design and technology.

Many other big companies have placed multiple orders for the Tesla Semi, including: Walmart, DHL, Meijer, Sysco, JK Moving, Asko, Ryder, and J.B. Hunt. This list is among several others that had single orders of Semi trucks.

Not Far Behind

While Tesla is breaking into and wanting to disrupt the trucking industry, it still has a few competitors out there. For example, Thor’s ET-One is bound to hit the roads around the same time the Tesla Semi will in 2019. ET-One has a 300-mile range off a single charge and a competitive $150,000 price tag that is the same as Tesla’s own 300-mile model.

There are also a number of other electric heavy-duty and semi trucks in the market. For example, Efficient Drivetrains Inc (EDI) has several hybrid and all-electric retrofits, with many of their business occurring in China.

Orange EV also has their all-electric terminal truck, and sold 10 of their T-Series to intermodal rail yard operator Rail Management Services. Orange EV claims the use of one truck could displace as much as 160 tons of carbon dioxide emissions a year, as well as 1.7 tons of nitrogen oxide emissions, 1.6 tons of carbon monoxide emissions, and as much as 80 kilograms of particulate matter. They have Extended Duty (160 kWh) battery packs as well.

Other notable competitors include Motiv Power Systems with their Motiv All-Electric Powertrain, BYD’s plug-in electric trucks, Wrightspeed’s hybrid powertrains (notably created by Tesla co-founder Ian Wright), Switzerland’s E-Force One 18-ton trucks with a 300-kilometer range, and the collaborative effort of Renault & Groupe Delanchy’s 13-ton all-electric refrigerated box truck meant to deliver produce in parts of France.