Bold Business Logo

GE Developing A Massive Jet Engine For the Future

General Electric’s projected revenue of $123.8 billion is not a modest figure for the multinational conglomerate. With this value on hand, the Boston-based company can develop high-quality services for power generation and aviation sectors — and good thing, GE aircraft engines is doing just that.

Now, the billion-dollar corporation has created a new benchmark after it engineered the very first large jet engine for commercial purposes.

In the words of Jeff Immelt, the former CEO of General Electric, “The ability to demand high performance without being heartless, has been a part of GE for a long time.” This quotation has served the purpose of GE, especially when it delved into a new project that got the attention of critics and spectators alike.

GE being a global leader when it comes to innovation conducted its very first flight test for the biggest commercial jet engine called the GE9X, a 100,000-pound thrust engine.

What Makes GE9X Big?

Word has it that GE9X is as big as the fuselage of its test plane.

The jet engine’s front fan is a world record holder for its 11 feet diameter size. GE9X has 3D-printed fuel nozzles and parts of it are also made from materials called ceramic matrix composites (CMCs). 

According to reports, the large jet engine will undertake multiple and different run-throughs that would check if its thermal, aerodynamic, and mechanical features are going to be ready in the future. The trials will last for several months.

Boeing 747 of Boeing, the number one manufacturer of commercial jets, is the test plane that was used for examining the capabilities of the GE9X engine. The billion-dollar company chose the specific plane type in order to see if the engine will be fit for the Boeing’s latest version of 777 jets, the Boeing 777x. Authorities have suggested that the said plane will be operational in the year 2020.

For now, authorities and engineers are focused on making sure that the test plane and jet engine will pass the safety certification to be held in 2019.

If deemed successful, the GE9X will not just be the largest available jet engine in the world because it will also be fuel-efficient, noiseless, and is 5% more economical. These features mean more jetliner manufacturers would get their hand onto the GE9X.

The engine is not yet out in the market but several airlines have already ordered over 700 GE9X engines. The following are some of the airline companies that devoted their trust to the large commercial jet engine:

  • Qatar Airways – The Doha-based air transportation company delivers the passenger, mail, and cargo transport services.
  • Lufthansa – Lufthansa provides cargo and passenger air transportation and airplane maintenance services.
  • Cathay Pacific – Founded in 1946, Cathay Pacific owns and runs charter flights for both passengers and cargoes.
  • Emirates – Emirates is an airline corporation that provides services around the world.
  • Etihad Airways – The Abu Dhabi-based company operates its services across the United Arab Emirates.

The ordered jet engines were valued for a whopping price of $29 billion. The market for the GE9X engine has not even been launched but it’s predicted to disrupt its future sales positively.

Not The First Time

“Three is a charm.” This proverb might have been applicable to the story of GE’s engine trial. It is not actually the first time that the Boston-based company planned a flight test because this is their third try.

The first one was announced last year of December, however, because of unwanted technical dilemmas for both the large jet engine and the test plane, the trial was canceled. The second testing was announced last February of this year and just like the first one, it was also canceled due to a minor design issue in the engine’s turbofan.

Because of the great efforts exerted by the company’s engineers, the latest trial became very successful.

Chuck Jackson, the program leader for the GE9X project, said, “Due to the significant amount of new technologies in the GE9X, we planned the testing program differently. The early testing informed the design and manufacturing and allowed us to freeze the product definition and test the total engine as soon as possible.”

MTU Aero Engines from Germany, IHI Corp from Japan, and Safran from France are three of the companies that have tirelessly helped General Electronic develop the GE9X.

General Electric is still in the early stage of their trials but the company is already seeing positive outcomes. If GE played their cards right in the following flight tests, they might generate a bold impact by persuading other engine makers to produce large engines as well. It could then lead to the creation a new market for the large commercial jet engines.

 

 

 

 

Computer Chip Visionaries Win Turing Award

The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) awarded computer chip visionaries John Hennessy and David Patterson the 2017 A.M. Turing Award, a $1 million prize considered the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for computer science. The pair’s bold innovations in the industry earned them the prestigious award named after Alan Turing, a British researcher, known for cracking German enigma codes during World War II and affecting what computer science is today.

Hennessy, a Stanford graduate, and Patterson, a Berkeley graduate, are both San Francisco Bay Area professors who work with top technology company Google, Inc. Together, they have revolutionized processors using reduced instruction set computing (RISC) technology.

Worth the RISC

computer chip vissionaries win turing award infographic

Hennessy and Patterson received the prestigious Turing award for their contributions to the industry. Their RISC tech helped fuel the growth of what today are big names such as Sun Microsystems and Silicon Graphics, paving the way for today’s major smartphone industry. Over the course of about 30 years, the pair’s bold moves have changed the direction of technology, while at the same time embodying the Silicon Valley ethos of always innovating, trying new things, and essentially throwing out the old or outdated way of approaching solutions.

Together, the pair is also currently working on other astounding pieces of technology, such as the special-purpose chips for Google’s Tensor Processing Unit which helps improve and speed up artificial intelligence (AI).

As with many other risky moves, the industry did not exactly welcome Hennessy and Patterson’s bold idea with open arms. “The initial reception was, ‘These two academics are crazy, they don’t know what they’re talking about, this technology will never work in the real world,’” Hennessy recalled.

Much to peoples’ surprise, RISC worked. Linley Gwennap, a Linley Group analyst, said that “RISC did win the day from a technology standpoint” after plenty of debate.

Eventually, Hennessy’s startup MIPS helped catapult his ideas and winning the hearts of Silicon Graphics, while Patterson’s Berkeley team created what is now Sun Microsystems’s SPARC processor. Their joint efforts also helped affirm Silicon Valley’s place by shifting the computing industry from East Coast bigwigs like IBM and Digital Equipment Corp. to them – Silicon Valley has established the Bay Area as a technology company mecca.

Back to Basics

One of the major reasons people doubted what Hennessy and Patterson had to offer is because their approach was different. It seemed like a counterintuitive idea, even to experts. Stemming from an idea by Hennessy dating as far back as 1980, he published an academic paper in October 2017 stating that silicon chips kept becoming more complex as time passes, but that machines may become more powerful if simpler computer chips were used.

Today, over 99 percent of all new chips take advantage of the pair’s RISC architecture, based on data released by the ACM.

Patterson and Hennessy’s idea of using simpler chips is making waves in the industry. Their argument that simpler chips not only ran faster, but also consumed less power, makes chip designers’ lives much simpler and easier as well. As such, the RISC architecture’s bold impacts resonate beyond what consumers experience, eventually becoming the standard for almost all computer servers and workstations that previously held back even the biggest companies and corporations around the world.

“This is the one fundamental idea that has been sustained over the last several decades of chip design,” said Dave Ditzel. A chip industry veteran, Ditzel also studied with Patterson at Berkeley, and is now in the process of building Esperanto, a RISC chip startup.

“I expect this to play a vital role in the future,” said Patterson. “And the architecture is not that different from what John and I described back in 1980.” Ditzel concurs, saying people need to start approaching design differently. “Complexity is even more of an enemy than it was before,” Ditzel said.

With Patterson and Hennessy spearheading this vital change to what technology we have today, the distinguished Google engineers are positively affecting the entire industry. Bill Gates, Microsoft founder, recently commended their work as well. Their contributions “have proven to be fundamental to the very foundation upon which an entire industry flourished,” he affirmed.

 

Mac Is Switching From Intel To Apple-Designed ARM Processors Cartoon

cartoon of the Apple logo kicking out Intel's logo from the top of a three-step pedestal symbolizing the eventual switching of Mac from Intel to Apple-designed ARM processors
Mac is switching from the use of Intel to Apple-designed ARM processors. What does this move from Apple mean for Mac users and other computer manufacturers?

Apple To Change Mac Processors For The Second Time Around

In 2005, Apple made a public announcement that they would start using Intel x86 processors for their Mac computers. The transition helped to revive Apple’s Mac success with great results, leading Apple to gain a gigantic market value of $900 billion. But not every story has a successful conclusion. Apple’s decision to switch away from Intel may represent part of a wider trend of big customers moving to design their own components. But, why would Apple and other technology companies build their own?

Shannon Cross, an analyst at Cross Research, said, “We think that Apple is looking at ways to further integrate their hardware and software platforms, and they’ve clearly made some moves in the space, trying to integrate iOS and macOS. “ She added, “It makes sense that they are going in this direction. If you look at incremental R&D spend, it’s gone into ways to try to vertically integrate their components so they can add more functionality for competitive differentiation.”

According to reports, Apple is planning to switch processors for their Mac computers by the year 2020. The initiative called Kalamata is still in its initial period but they will transition from using Intel processors to their very own chips. Five percent of Intel’s revenue comes from Apple but the fallout could be much larger if other manufacturers follow suit.

If deemed successful, Apple will create a history of becoming the first PC maker to use its own central processing units. Companies that use Intel chips include Asustek Computer, Inc., Dell Technologies, Inc., HPInc., and the Lenovo Group Ltd.

Why Make The Transition Now?

Apple Mac Processor Will soon be Replaced

Apple transitions away from Intel computer chips infographic

Apple is known for producing top of the line devices like its iPads, iPhones, Apple TVs, and Apple Watches. All of these gadgets use similar processors that are devised by Apple with the assistance from one of their partners, Arm Holdings PLC. With Apple having its own hardware, software and processor, it will create a more fully integrated experience compared to any other company.

Arm Holdings PLC is an England-based company that develops software and semiconductor tools.

In addition to allowing the Apple devices to work as one, the Kalamata initiative could also help the company release new models on its own pace, as they will no longer rely on Intel’s processor availability.  Also, as artificial intelligence and other advances are proprietary to Apple and by using their own processors, they can keep these advances more protected from competitors copying their advances.

Another reason why Apple also considers switching processors is Intel’s stationary performance over the years. There is no doubt that the processors of Intel are all reliable, time-tested, and durable. It seems like everything is going as planned for Intel, causing them not to change anything – and unfortunately, that is where the problem begins.

Apple’s processors for their devices have accelerated over time, even defeating the chips that were developed by Intel for its own computer lines. Apple does not want their Mac computers to be left behind, which obviously is key to their decision to choose a different route. Apple is also working on a new software platform called Marzipan that would allow users to run iPhone and iPad apps on Macs. The products are slated to be released in September this year.

Apple Saw It Coming

Even before the Kalamata initiative took place, Apple was already doing researching and creating innovation for their processors.

Because Apple wants its devices to work as one, it came up with a bold idea to develop a new software platform labeled as ‘Marzipan’. The new software is going to be a cross-platform application that will have the ability to combine iOS and macOS. It means that Marzipan could be operated on iPad, iPhone, and Mac computers.

Apple has also presented Mac computers that are based on ARM co-processors. The technology has the capability to run an operating system of an iOS that could better the security measures of the Mac products. Reports have suggested that next year, Apple will release Mac products with ARM-based co-processors.

The possible separation of the two powerhouse companies will surely hurt Intel’s performance and is a bold move by Apple. The question becomes, will the other computer manufacturers follow Apple’s lead or stick with Intel in the future.

How can we help?