Bold Business Logo

Ride-Share Cheaper Than Owning a Car? Take the Test!!

Reports say that most Americans think it is much better to purchase their own cars than to rely on ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft. They believe that it would be more practical and would allow them to save more money in the end – but this is not what studies are showing. Various companies have recently conducted research proving that taking ride-sharing services is going to be much cheaper than owning a car.

The first study is from QuoteWizard, a Seattle-based startup known for its operation as an insurance marketplace. Its users evaluate costs among companies in a specific industry.

The biggest insurance comparison marketplace recently piloted a study that is going to determine which mode of transportation people would choose. In the study, they discovered that by 2027, the cost of having a car could be more expensive than to ride innovative services such as rideshare.



Denver and Seattle are two major cities in America that could potentially experience this change. QuoteWizard also mentioned that Lyft, a well-known transportation network corporation, and Uber, a mobile and web-based application, are two ride-sharing giants that would push Americans to choose ride-sharing services over owning a vehicle.

In Seattle, the estimated annual cost for opting ride-share services is going to be $6,943 and in Denver, it will be just $5,679. These figures are far cheaper than purchasing a car, which according to QuoteWizard is going to cost $7,598 by the year 2027.

The second study is from Rethinking Transportation, a report that examines the effects of disruption across the economy. According to the report, selecting autonomous ride-sharing taxis could also be much cheaper than purchasing a vehicle by 2030.

James Arbib, a venture investor from London, and Tony Seba, a serial entrepreneur and author, co-wrote the report. Rethinking Transportation discussed the fact that average households in America could save up to $5,600 a year on transportation if they choose ride-sharing services.

Arbib says, “Any technology that can save a number of lives as autonomous vehicles might do – there is sort of a moral imperative to try to introduce it when you can. From a regulatory perspective, we expect there to be a supportive framework.”

The final study talks about the same thing but focuses more on one of the most popular cities in America, which is Los Angeles.

Driverless Future, a policy roadmap for different cities, has recently conducted a research on the growing demand for ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft in Los Angeles. They found out that more than 2 million people might give up their cars because of the said demand.

Los Angeles car owners believed that they could save more money by shifting to hail an autonomous car because it is less expensive.

According to Joe Iacobucci, the Director of Transit, What we saw in the model – and we ran it a few different ways – is it is going to be a monumental shift. Forty percent to 60% who are driving today will have an economic rationale to shift to those services.”

The policy roadmap report has also conducted a study on other cities like New York and Dallas. It saw a 60% and 31% car ownership drop, respectively.

Iacobucci also stated that fewer cars into the streets are actually going to be beneficial for more cities. He said, “When you look at an average street, in a lot of cases, you could say 25% of the street is actually dedicated to the storage of cars. If we need one drop-off space that satisfies 20 parking spaces, we could essentially create on-street bus networks, separated bikes lanes, and large pedestrian facilities to make out streets the best practice of a living street.”

A Tool That Compares Costs Of Ride-Sharing Services And Personal Cars

Conducted studies and reports are not the only ones that support the rise of ride-sharing services, because even tools are also stating the same thing.

Ride or Drive calculator is becoming one of the hottest tools for many people who want to make sure that their money will not go to waste.

Todd Davidson, a research associate and lecturer at the University of Texas at Austin’s Energy Institute and Webber Energy Group, says, “The goal of this work was to try to basically take the true, full cost of ownership – all of the obvious and non-obvious costs associated with owning a car – and then begin to compare it to mobility services.”

The tool has the ability to plug in the following things:

  • The sticker price of the new vehicle
  • How much one drives
  • Comprehensive information about the loan

The tool has the ability to tweak the following things:

  • How much one pays for maintenance
  • Insurance
  • Gas
  • Registration

The tool has the ability to calculate the following things:

  • Property taxes one pays on his/her garage
  • The worth of the time spent stuck in traffic

Ride or Drive is going to be useful for many people because they will now get the chance to understand how the mode of transportation patterns could change in the future.

In the United States, the ride-sharing industry has a whopping revenue of $17, 191 million in 2018. This numerical value is a living testimony that ride-sharing services are on its way up.

Uber and Lyft are really helping transform the transportation model but it does not mean the end of the era of cars. Owning a car is still and will always be a practical thing to do and a part of the American dream.

Smart Assistants, Conquering New Heights of Service or Threats?

A few years ago, Amazon Echo kicked off the smart assistants trend which started the race of virtual assistants among major companies. There are dozens of available assistants on the market and it is expected that more will be released in the coming years.

According to Consumer Intelligence Research Partners’ report, Amazon Echo is leading the competition with 20 million units delivered, outselling its nearest rival Google Home more than three times.

As homes upgrade and get smarter, Google Assistant, Siri, and Alexa, assist through devices, following voice commands to play music, set timers, and even teach children to spell difficult words. Needless to say, they’re known to be the best of their kind.

Smarts assistants have developed from a couple of originating places, but have already converged to a larger scale. Amazon Echo’s Alexa introduced the technology of a voice command speaker, and was later included to the list of Amazon Fire TV devices and other third-party speakers. Most consumers initially perceived that Alexa was mainly used for streaming music because it was used as a feature on speakers. When Amazon offered Alexa to third-party companies, smart home providers incorporated it to let users enjoy many features, including adjusting thermostat or controlling light through voice commands.

Siri and Google Assistant started as a voice dialing services on iPhones and Android phones, respectively. Both of these features allowed users to play songs, make and take calls, and reply to SMS, whether in the office, at home, or in a car. So far, Google has accomplished a better job connecting into homes with speakers and smart TVs than Apple has.

With the rapid growth of smart assistants and demand across the globe, these smart devices will not remain on bookshelves and coffee tables for too long. Sooner or later, smart digital assistants will be integrated into corporations as well – a possibility that is not foreign to the creators of these smart devices. Last fall, it was announced by Amazon that they would release Alexa for Business during their re:Invent 2017 conference.

Other than its conference-calling feature, Alexa for Business offers checking of calendar appointment, scheduling meetings, creating a to-do listing and time management reminders with the option to gather business-related information from Splunk, Concur, and Salesforce among many others.

Smart Assistants Analysis Result by Stone Temple

Stone Temple, a US digital agency, analyzed the level of general knowledge these digital smart assistants have. This is the second time that the company conducted this study by making the selected smart assistants reply to 5,000 general questions. Based on the results, Google Assistant on smartphones performed with the highest accuracy of 95%, and had an answering share of 77.2%. Amazon Alexa answered 53.7%, of which 82.6% were correct, compared to its last year performance of 19.8% of answering share with 19.8% of correct answers. Siri from Apple answered 40% with 80% accuracy, a much better performance than last year with 31.4% answering share with 86.1% correct answers.  These figures only prove that smart digital assistants are getting smarter and smarter.

In another unlikely event, reports of Alexa laughing without any commands coming from its users have added to some concerns regarding the security and privacy of smart assistants.

Some users narrated that the AI assistant living on Echo speakers started laughing creepily at them, without being told to. Amazon then quickly addressed the issue and released a fix. The smart assistant was just activated by itself after mishearing some vague instructions, as per Amazon.

The quick acknowledgement made by Amazon was a good step, but the explanation did not directly satisfy some users, given that they posted and shared videos proving that Alexa was laughing without any voice commands, not even misheard instructions. Amazon also suggested that the digital assistant might have picked up distant noises from the background. There’s a possibility though that the company just might reveal the true story behind all the fiasco.

Over time, Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri will more likely continue to get progressively smarter. A day will come that they might actually live up to the expectation and potential that they have promised to deliver. Until then, they will remain as eerie, always-eavesdropping novelty services that collect users’ data. For what it’s worth, at least users can track the traffic jam in their area without even watching boring news report.

 

 

Game-changing Vodafone – Liberty Global Deal Closing in to Reality

Vodafone, the second largest mobile operator in the world, is close to clinching a game-changing deal to buy some of Liberty Global’s European assets. According to reports, the long-awaited plan of Vodafone is already in the final stages.  An announcement regarding the agreement is expected to be released next week. If both parties close the deal, the total worth of Vodafone Liberty Global transaction is estimated to be €16.5 billion, including debt.

In February, Vittorio Colao, Chief Executive of Vodafone, had declared that the said acquisition of the cable group could expand to the UK market. The discussions pertained to buying Liberty Global’s Unity media network in Germany, including assets in areas of Eastern Europe – a buyout that would make a much bigger rival to Deutsche Telekom in its own home market.


Part of the UK market is Virgin Media, a company owned by Liberty Global, but it’s outside the discussion. However, Colao was positive that it could still change and that European assets were on top of his list. While at the Mobile World Congress event held in Barcelona, Colao expressed that he should not get too personal with Deutsche Telekom’s head Tim Höttges, before stating that he was actually surprised that the chief executive of the largest telecommunication company in Europe had commented about the risk to competition.

The merger in the German market would mark as Liberty Global’s third move to restructure its cable properties in German-speaking areas in Europe. Liberty traded its Austrian cable operator UPC to T-Mobile Austria, Deutsche Telekom’s subsidiary, last December 2017.  

Liberty Global also owns UPC Romania, the second biggest cable company on the Romanian market. Last year, the company grew its number of clients by 4% to 1,345 million and its revenue increased by 6.5% to 734,4 million. On May 9, Liberty Global will release its first-quarter report upon closing of the US market, and Vodafone will report its yearly results on May 15.

In 2015, the two companies had previously talked about the deal but weren’t able to sign contracts due to value differences.

When the discussions were reported last February, Royal Bank of Canada’s analysts commented that the FTSE 100-listed company should pay around €20.7 billion in exchange for the European assets of Liberty Global.

The free cash flow of Vodafone PLC would receive a high boost if discussions of acquiring the large shares of John Malone’s European cable company Liberty Global close into a deal, as per Citigroup.

“We think a potential debt and hybrid funded deal to buy Unitymedia for €15.8 – 19.0 billion (10-12x FY19 OCF) would add €700-830 million or 12-15% to Vodafone’s free cash flow,” said Citi.

Citi had upgraded Vodafone from ‘neutral’ to a ‘buy’ rating on a lowered value of 220p.

“Vodafone’s markets remain competitive but Germany and Spain look to us to be structurally attractive for the long term, the UK is improving, the Netherlands may have stabilized and India could end up with a much more appealing market structure. On the other hand, conditions look set to get tougher in Italy and near term,” the broker added.

Imagine A Meatless World Infographic

meatless industry facts infographic

How can we help?