Bold Business Logo

An Ecological Disaster in the Making—And a Call for Bold Solutions

The coral reefs of the world are dying at an alarming rate. It is an oceanic ecological disaster in the making, and a problem that demands bold solutions. But before those solutions can come, there must first be an understanding of what role coral reefs play in the world’s ecosystems. There must also be an understanding of the role mankind has played in setting in motion the wheels of this calamity.

Renowned coral expert John “Charlie” Veron became a believer after witnessing massive chunks of the Great Barrier Reef dying off. The former Chief Scientist at the Australian Institute of Marine Science is now convinced that ecological disaster is inevitable… and it is all due to global warming. Veron has labeled this oceanic ecological disaster “a planetary catastrophe.”

An Ecological Disaster in the Making
John Veron Discussing an Ecological Disaster in the Making

But is this disaster unavoidable? Or could innovative and bold solutions save the day? These are the questions scientists are struggling with to prevent coral reefs from dying off completely.

Coral Reefs: More Than Just a Photo Op

With their seemingly endless array of life teeming within, coral reefs have long been the “photo op” of choice for scuba divers and snorkelers alike. But there is more to these underwater organisms than just a pretty backdrop.

“Coral reefs serve many different ecosystems,” says Dr. Ilsa Kuffner, a Research Marine Biologist with the United States Geological Survey. “They’re huge suppliers of various kinds of proteins to coastal regions that depend on them for food.”

In 2004, an earthquake in the Indian Ocean resulted in a tsunami that killed hundreds of thousands of people in Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand. But coral reefs can act as a buffer for such potentially catastrophic events. “They serve as coastline protection,” says Kuffner, “affecting the attenuation of wave energy for events that can impact coastline areas.”

Anatomy of an Ecological Disaster

Veron began diving in the Great Barrier Reef off the Australian coast in the 1960s. He became convinced of climate change in the 1990s when heat trapped from greenhouse gases combined with the El Nino effect to cause oceanic temperatures to rise. Once these temperatures rose above 70 degrees, coral reefs became susceptible to serious damage. The result: a “bleaching” of the reefs, with the coral expelling the symbionts that had long called it home.

“The scientific consensus is that most of the coral mortality since the 1980s is caused by temperature anomalies,” says Kuffner. “Even a couple degrees of difference can cause a breakdown of the symbiosis that occurs within the coral reefs.” She adds, “The hypothesis is that coral reefs, after bleaching, become more vulnerable to disease.”

Ilsa B. Kuffner, Ph.D. Research Marine Biologist

Thus far, over a third of the Great Barrier Reef has been affected. Worth noting is that the Great Barrier Reef is roughly the size of Italy, and since coral reefs participate in the lifecycle of nearly a third of all marine life, the impact a great “die off” can have is global in scope.

It’s no stretch to see the causal relationship between the increase of oceanic temperature and the man-made problem of global warming.

Efforts to Thwart the Disaster

The government of Australia has taken steps to save the Great Barrier Reef dying, allocating $4 million to a foundation to preserve and restore it as much as possible. But this financial investment is not likely to prevent the pending ecological disaster.

Other organizations are trying to develop solutions to the problem. The USGS, established by Congress in 1879, provides scientific research to advise decisions on the management of natural resources in US jurisdictions.

Similar efforts have been undertaken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The agency monitors oceans, major waterways, and the atmosphere while also seeking to prevent various ecological disasters. The NOAA more closely tracks the condition of national coral reefs, but it is also involved in global ecosystems. Current investigations are exploring coral reef sanctuaries where conservation and recovery efforts may offer greater success. Here again, efforts to find solutions in preventing oceanic ecological disasters have yet to find effective solutions.

What Can Be Done to Save the Coral Reefs?

Reducing carbon fuels is essential for any hope of recovery, and coal is the biggest culprit. Unfortunately, experts estimate that global warming effects on oceans would last 20 years after all carbon emissions stop.

Still, all is not doom and gloom. Sure, curbing global warming is high on the “to do” list, and that’s a task that’s proven problematic. But nature has given the world a ray of hope.

Kuffner describes a phenomenon akin to natural selection, with whole sections of bleached coral reef laying beside sections that appear unaffected. What this points to is that, similar to certain members of a species possessing an enhanced immunological response to a pathogen, so too do coral reefs sometimes have a special resilience. With more research, scientists could theoretically find a way to nurture that trait.

Says Kuffner, “This could be done in a way that capitalizes on that variability to help natural selection.”

“There’s more variability to these simple organisms than originally thought. So there is a lot of hope.” –Kuffner

The Blue Economy is Dependent on Coral Reefs

While coral reefs have the potential to recover, the length of time required is significant. Experts, unfortunately, believe that five of the next seven years will see additional bouts of mass coral reef bleaching.

Bold solutions are needed to prevent the Great Barrier Reef, as well as coral reefs around the world, from dying. International collaboration and scientific solutions offer the best hope.

From massive reductions in carbon emissions to conservation and restoration efforts, several opportunities for positive change exist. But those solutions are needed immediately and to support the blue economy’s future. It is time for bold businesses along with educational institutions and government agencies to band together to save the coral reefs from ecological disaster.

The Trump Cybersecurity Policy and Its Impact on Citizens and National Matters

One of the great Greek philosophers, Plato, once said, “Necessity is the mother of invention.” Looking at the threats of today, we realize that cyber threats are real. We live in an age where criminal activities in cyberspace are as real as the criminal acts done in the streets and thwarting their crimes is a growing necessity. So what are we going to do about it? What is the government doing to defend its people from such threats? Well, the necessity for a defense against cyber threats has moved the U.S. government to develop a plan of action to address this.

The Trump administration released its National Cyber Strategy in September 2018, outlining how government agencies will handle cybersecurity and cyberthreats. The White House has been delayed from rolling out the doctrine, which was expected 90 days after President Donald Trump’s inauguration in January 2017. Since the inauguration, several changes in leadership occurred—which included the loss of Tom Bossert, former Homeland Security advisor, and Rob Joyce, who was formerly the special assistant to the president and cybersecurity coordinator at the White House.

Nevertheless, the administration now has a definitive guide in addressing and deterring cyberattacks of varying degrees. This document is the U.S.’ first full cybersecurity policy in 15 years.

Trump Cybersecurity Policy in Detail

The strategy takes on an aggressive stance. “We will respond offensively as well as defensively,” Bolton stated when explaining about tackling the government’s adversaries. This is a different policy from the one that existed during former President Obama’s administration, which required the military to consult with the State Department, intelligence communities, and other agencies before addressing an attack. In the Trump policy, the military has freer rein. Federal agencies can now work with state and local governments—even private businesses—to improve defenses against cyberattacks.

The expression of the Trump Cybersecurity policy is written and arranged according to the pillars of the U.S.’ National Security Strategy. Below are the four pillars and the summary of their content.


Pillar I: Protect the American People, the Homeland, and the American Way of Life

  1. The government will secure federal networks and information by centralizing the management and oversight of federal civilian cybersecurity. Under this rule, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has greater power to access agency information systems for cybersecurity purposes.

The Federal Government will deploy secure and reliable technology. This includes better information-sharing processes between agencies—increasing threat awareness throughout the supply chain.

  1. Securing critical infrastructure is another priority for the administration. It will raise the base level of cybersecurity across all agency infrastructure and refine the roles and responsibilities of all those involved for clearer accountability. This will help address threats and vulnerabilities in the systems and will encourage inter-agency training and collaboration.

The Trump cybersecurity policy will manage threats according to risk magnitude. It will also reduce risks in seven key areas: national security, energy, banking and finance, communications, health and safety, information technology, and transportation.

The Federal Government will continue to protect the election cybersecurity standards, the electoral process, and the tools that deliver this service.

It will improve transportation and maritime cybersecurity to avoid economic disruptions on shipments and other investments. It will develop next-generation maritime infrastructure to protect against cyber exploitation.

The internet plays a vital role in advancing economic prosperity, knowledge, and security. Therefore, positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT); intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR); satellite communications, and weather monitoring are critical assets that must be protected from evolving cyberthreats.

  1. In combatting cybercrime and improving incident-reporting, laws will be enforced to identify and prosecute offenders, dismantle criminal infrastructure, limit the spread of threats, and prevent criminals from profiting from their activities.

The cybersecurity policy will modernize electronic surveillance, update computer-crime laws, and promptly respond to incident reports. It will reduce threats from international criminal organizations and will better locate and apprehend criminals abroad.

a photo of a soldier fighting cyber threats
Establishing a superior cybersecurity workforce is integral today and in the future.

Pillar II: Promote American Prosperity

The Trump administration knows the profound influence of the United States in the tech ecosystem and cyberspace. Because of this, it wants to preserve this influence for its economic growth and innovation.

  1. The government will foster a vibrant and resilient digital economy by incentivizing an adaptable and secure tech marketplace. This includes the development, adoption, and evolution of security innovations and processes. It will eliminate policy barriers to accelerate innovations.

There will be a stronger investment in next-generation infrastructure. Thus, the government will explore using emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and quantum computing. The government will also promote the free flow of data across borders—hence, forgoing data localization and regulation for digital protectionism, which tends to negatively impact the competitiveness of U.S. businesses.

  1. The Trump cybersecurity policy will foster and protect U.S. ingenuity to keep American inventions and innovations flourishing. It will thoroughly review foreign investment and operations in the U.S. to protect the country’s operations, such as telecommunication networks.

The administration sees the protection of intellectual property rights as critical to its economic growth and innovation. It will implement a new intellectual property rights system to protect trademarks, copyrights, and patents. Trade secrets and emerging technologies will be protected from adversarial nations so that the U.S. can maintain its edge in research and development.

  1. Developing a superior cybersecurity workforce is integral in the campaign. It will hire only the best and brightest talent who can competently make significant contributions to the organization.

The administration will work with Congress to implement training and offer educational opportunities to create a strong and able cybersecurity workforce. There will be Federal recruitment, training, and upskilling of people across all backgrounds. This applies both to workers in America and the Federal cybersecurity workforce. It will also reward high-performing talent who defend and support the U.S.’ cybersecurity infrastructure.


Pillar III: Preserve Peace through StrengthThe Trump cybersecurity policy aims to identify, counter, disrupt, degrade, and deter destabilizing behavior in cyberspace. It reiterates that cyberspace criminality will no longer be treated as a separate category from offline ones.

  1. The government wishes to enhance cyber stability through norms of responsible behavior. It will encourage universal adherence to cyber norms. The U.S. will urge other nations to affirm specific principles that define proper online behavior. As more countries agree to these expectations, this increasingly becomes a recognized standard for appropriate online behavior.
  2. The U.S. government will also attribute and deter unacceptable behavior in cyberspace. This plan ensures that there will be consequences for irresponsible behavior in cyberspace. Diplomatic, information, military, financial, intelligence, and law enforcement powers will be used accordingly if any malicious activities will harm the U.S. and its partners.

Objective and actionable information will be shared with various U.S. government agencies and partners. This plan of action will help all involved to develop the right responses to protect American interests. The U.S. will also impose informed, agreed-upon consequences against cybercriminals.

There will also be a Cyber Deterrence Initiative—a coalition that will develop strategies to make sure criminals understand the consequences of their actions. It will also counter pernicious cyber influence and information operations. It will use all available tools at its disposal to expose and combat those who propagate disinformation online.


Pillar IV: Advance American Influence

The government claims that the world looks up to the United States for leadership, given that the U.S. was where the internet began. It plans to preserve long-term openness, interoperability, security, and the reliability of the internet.

  1. The Trump cybersecurity policy states that it will promote an open, interoperable, reliable, and secure internet. Therefore, it will protect and promote internet freedom as a basic human right. It also supports the free flow of international communications in all industries. Freedom of expression and national security go hand-in-hand. The government will also work with nations, industries, the academia, and civilians that share the same views and principles. Working together will then help advance human rights and internet freedom.
  2. The administration plans to build international cyber capacity by investing in global partnerships that complement the government’s work. It will also expand its efforts to share information and technology with other partners. Ultimately, there will be a rich collaboration to build capacity on all fronts of cybersecurity.

a pair of hands typing on a laptop keyboard about the Trump Cybersecurity policy

Here comes the Trump cybersecurity policy.

The Trump Cybersecurity Policy—A Bold Move

The Trump cybersecurity policy is an aggressive approach towards malicious online activity. As the first policy in 15 years, it’s indicative of the government’s acknowledgment and understanding of the new reality of the internet.

It’s a holistic and proactive approach to cyber vulnerabilities that plague the U.S. and other nations. It takes on a multifront approach—addressing needs to train personnel, educating civilians, and creating national and international associations that help further the right to privacy, freedom, and cybersecurity.

The Trump administration isn’t hesitant to use all its powers and efforts to apprehend cybercriminals. The implications and repercussions will undoubtedly affect international politics, and it is something the world needs to watch out for. Perhaps this is the beginning of a new cyber climate that the world is eventually moving towards to—one that is truly integrated into our everyday reality.

Sources:

NATIONAL CYBER STRATEGY of the United States of America (September 2018)

Trump launches new national cyber strategy

Cybersecurity: Donald Trump’s new strategy allows more offensive operations

Siemens and Sutter Hill Ventures Are Reinventing the Battery Through Sila Nanotechnologies

Smartphones, smartwatches, cameras, autonomous vehicles, drones, and smart home gadgets—these technologies are replete with countless advancements. But the one thing that powers all of these—namely, the humble battery—is behind the times.

There hasn’t been any significant innovation in commercial and industrial batteries, only controversies, such as Samsung Galaxy Note 7s exploding or the excessive battery drain from the iOS 11.4 update. However, the tech industry is now seeing a bold breakthrough in batteries via battery specialist—Sila Nanotechnologies. This company has just received $70 million in funding.

The Battery Specialist and High Profile Investment

Sila Nanotechnologies announced on August 16, 2018, that it had raised $70 million in Series D Funding, led by private equity company, Sutter Hill Ventures. This round of funding saw the involvement of titan tech companies. Such titans include Siemens-backed Next47 and Amperex Technology Limited, which makes batteries for Apple and Samsung smartphones. The battery specialist has raised a total of $125 million from its group of investors—Bessemer Venture Partners, Chengwei Capital, In-Q-Tel, Matrix Partners, and Samsung.

a photo quote on the battery specialist, Sila Nanotechnologies, by Mike Speiser

“Changes in battery chemistry are generational, and Sila Nanotechnologies is bringing the next one to market,” said managing director of Sutter Hill Ventures, Mike Speiser. “Sila has solved the hard scientific and engineering problems and is ready to rapidly scale up manufacturing to meet the enormous demand for better batteries.”

He added that they support companies that solve global problems—from providing strong batteries for wearables, pocket devices, vehicles, and even grid infrastructure.

Investors believe that Sila Nanotechnologies has the right technology and the right team to improve energy density and life cycle. Batteries are instrumental to all electric devices and machinery, but current technology has not kept up with the advancements of today. The battery specialist knows there has to be critical innovation in the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries.

The Battery Specialist on Innovating the Battery

Sila Nanotechnologies CEO Gene Berdichevsky was Tesla employee number seven, an instrumental figure in its early days. He helped develop some of the first batteries for the Tesla Roadster. One of Tesla’s earlier problems was that their Li-ion batteries caught fire more often than they anticipated. Berdichevsky’s solution was to combine heat transfer materials, cooling channels, and battery arrangements so fires would be efficiently contained.

Since departing from Tesla, he has started his own company, Sila Nanotechnologies. The mission is to engineer products that dramatically increase the energy density of batteries to power smaller, lighter, and more durable electronic devices and vehicles. However, Li-ion batteries can only hold so much energy. They are also highly flammable and may not always fit different devices’ form factors.

Sila Nanotechnologies developed silicon-based nanoparticles that form high-capacity anodes. Berdichevsky said that an atom of silicon stores about 20 times more lithium than carbon atoms. As it takes fewer atoms to store lithium, batteries can have a smaller volume of material that stores the same amount of energy.

Sila Nanotechnologies’ batteries are robust and porous enough to take any swelling that affects Li-ion batteries. This fact promises stronger, longer-lasting batteries.


Using silicon instead of graphite for the battery’s anodes also reduces costs and drives up efficiency by 40 percent. If the batteries use 20 percent fewer cells, production costs also drop by 20 percent.

Sila Nanotechnologies, the Leading the New Era of Batteries

Sila Nanotechnologies has been working under the radar until now. However, with its recent round of funding, it’s hard not to take note of the company. Earlier this year, the battery specialist announced a partnership with BMW—for whom it will provide lithium-silicon batteries. BMW expects to incorporate the Sila Nanotechnologies batteries into their vehicles by 2030, potentially increasing their battery capacity by 10 to 15 percent.

a photo quote on the battery storage capacity, Sila Nanotechnologies, by Gene Berdichevsky

The world is anticipating the new improvements in battery technology. Additionally, when these improvements are rolled out to the public, electronics will become cheaper and will have fewer issues about battery life. Finally, through Sila Nanotechnologies, batteries are pushing boundaries in the tech world.

 

Sources:

Sila Nanotechnologies Announces $70 Million in Series D Funding Round to Scale the Next Generation of Battery Materials

35 Innovators Under 35: Gene Berdichevsky, 34

Sila Nanotechnologies raises $70 million for next-generation battery development

Batteries Still Suck, But Researchers Are Working On It

Sila Nano raises $70 million in funding for silicon-dominant battery anodes

How can we help?