Among techies and engineers in Silicon Valley, a not-so-quiet debate rages over the use of artificial intelligence. One camp advocates for the proprietary use of generative AI, especially those leading the charge like OpenAI. Others, however, strongly believe that things would be better if AI were ope-source. They state that an open-source AI platform offers many social as well as ethical benefits that are desperately needed. Notably, both sides make good points either for or against the promotion of an open-source AI platform. It’s unlikely the debate will be resolved any time soon. Despite this, it’s important to appreciate what’s at stake should AI be open source and if it’s not. And it’s helpful to know who’s in each camp as well as their motivations.
(It’s perilous to program AI with biases–read why in this Bold story.)
Recently, Elon Musk made a bold move in this regard. He released the raw computer code to his AI chatbot, Grok, to the public. As an advocate for an open-source AI platform for all, the action supports his overall philosophy. Other companies including some tech giants have similarly made coding to their AI products accessible. These actions are pushing the envelope in the debate that asks should AI be open source. Opponents worry that these decisions by Musk and others could usher in some serious threats to society. And like Pandora’s box, once a tipping point in access is reached, there’s no turning back. It seems therefore appropriate to explore both the benefits and risks of an open-source AI platform. This is clearly an issue that is already relevant and will be even more so in the months to come.
Elon Musk’s Open-Source Philosophy
Musk is well-known as the founder and owner of SpaceX, Tesla, and what used to be Twitter but is now X. What is less well known is that he also founded xAI, which is an independent AI company. Founded last year, xAI has lagged behind other generative AI companies. But this may soon change based on Musk’s recent strategies. By releasing the raw code to his AI chatbot, Grok, he invites public assistance in generative AI development. And combined with his access to training data, Musk could significantly improve his ranking among generative AI platforms. Many suspect this was his primary motivation for releasing Grok’s code in the first place.
Grok as an AI chatbot is unique in itself. It has been designed to respond to questions based in the science fiction novel “A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.” However, it’s worth noting that premium X users are allowed to ask Grok questions and receive answers. And Grok has also been trained not only on the novel but on posts made by X users. By releasing the code, Musk is essentially inviting all to advance his open-source AI platform further. And likewise, he’s putting his money where his mouth is in the “should AI be open source” category. While Musk may certainly enjoy some perks by doing so in the competition for generative AI products, he remains consistent. From the very start, he has supported transparent and public access to AI coding and development.
Other AI Companies’ Perspectives
Musk and xAI are not the only generative AI companies who have provided their open-source AI platform to the public. Meta/Facebook also has recently sourced its generative AI technology from its chatbot, LLaMa. Google and startup AI company Mistral have also allowed open access to some of their AI coding as well. This, however, has not been the case for OpenAI along with Microsoft, which has a major stake in OpenAI. Despite previously saying they would participate in an open-source AI platform sharing venture, this has yet to happen. In fact, Musk has filed a suit against the company because of their failure to follow up on these statements. While the suit isn’t likely to go anywhere, this highlights the active should AI be open-source debate. And it shows that some generative AI companies are quite hesitant to move in this direction.
Naturally, there are different motivations for these companies. Open AI is the market-leader at present, and as such, they believe they should safeguard their proprietary materials. Should Ai be open source and readily available to all, they have much more to lose in the process. In contrast, xAI and others that rank lower in generative AI have little to lose. By leveraging an open-source AI platform to gain others’ input, this might help them better compete with Open AI. In this regard, the arguments for and against an open-source AI platform extend beyond the philosophical. When it comes down to it, competition and market positioning likely influence perspectives. Should AI be open source, some companies see this as a threat while others as opportunities. As much as anything, this is affecting which side of the generative AI-open-source debate companies choose.
Pros and Cons of Open-Source AI Beyond Competition
Strong arguments do exist on both sides of the open-source AI platform conversation. The key risks involved should AI be open sourced are several and worth noting. Allowing access to AI coding could allow bad actors to use the technology for serious harm. Deepfake content including pornography, targeted harassment, impersonations, and cybersecurity threats are among some of the most notable risks. This could even lead to the development of automated weapons use, drone swarm attacks, and terrorism. However, allowing open-source AI platform access promotes transparency, accountability, and trust among the public. It also levels the playing field, not allowing tech giants to control how generative AI is used. Notably, good and bad exist no matter which choice is made.
Understanding this, it’s not likely that the question should AI be open source or not be answered in the near future. Musk has taken a bold step in advocating for an open-source AI platform while others are digging in against it. But it only takes a few to provide such access to the public to enable an open-source AI reality. From this perspective, the question may not be should Ai be open source or not. It’s more likely to be when will open sourcing of AI platforms exist.
Generative AI and Higher Education Are the Perfect Match–Read How in this Bold Story!
